
Web 1.0 and Web 2.0
My understanding of Web 1.0, is that a Web 1.0 site cannot be added to, nor adjusted other then by its creator. For example, each of us have our own Facebook by now, or if not, you live under some kind of rock in the deep oceans :). Blogs, are also a Web 1.0 because no-one can alter the media devices found or written text other then that of the owner.
Having said that, if you were to create a Facebook page, and invite a large amount of people and then create them all as admins? That's a different story. Would that be a Web 1.0, or a Web 2.0? In my opinion, it would be a Web 2.0 to the newly advised admins, because they are fully functional at being able to add content such as images, links, status updates, but simply because you are the main creator, these admins are unable to 100% access your available hierarchy of ownership of the site. Confused?
Well to put it into perspective, a university moodle site, or online learning program can be created the same way as a Facebook page (how amazing all of this integrated technology) by creating admins (lecturers) who are fully operational in regards to accessing personal information, responding to student needs and emails, viewing each students online progress activity for each subject, but they are unable, nor allowed to update the core content of the subject.
To sum it all up, there may be Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 differentials, but personally I think there are many levels of ability within each technology tool that makes technology and the continually changing internet so diverse for many uses, not only for learning but for general communication (See digital tool 2 - Concept mapping).
Why you ask? Why not just use Facebook for collaborative online learning?
Facebook is commonly known for it's continually updated memoirs and daily/hourly/by the minute (for some every second) postings of peoples thoughts, activities etc, it has become a very openly discussed forum for everyone that you know or don't know, that 'could' be used to support learning, if the correct privacy settings were to be adjusted and catered for, so that 80% of the world did not have access to the personal information within a matter of 20 minutes.
Blogging, from specific online blog locations such as this one, to me, is more personal, less popular then sites such as facebook and twitter, and you need to be registered in order to view other peoples blogs. It's more interesting to add content with the ability to change text type, size, colour, add images and link words to websites, very similar features to that of a wiki.
If I were in a classroom setting, and learning about... lets say ' Extreme sports', I would with the class, write down all of the names of extreme sports that come to mind, draw them out of a hat (assuming that there were enough for every child) , create a online blog with the title, of course ' Extreme sports', and give each child the password. They would then go off and research their sport and then go online and create a title for their sport whilst adding their information. Each student would then comment on their fellow classmates information.
Well, being that Web 1.0 is the state of a website that simply cannot be added to, nor adjusted other then by the creator of that site, and Web 2.0 being an adjustable, readable and re-writable web program, I would have to come to the conclusion that sites such as Facebook and blogs would be a Web 1.0 to the readers, and a Web 2.0 are simliar to Wiki's and wikipedia that can be adjusted? Does everyone agree with me there? That is of